Job fears, environmental strain and security threats are fuelling the botlash, yet experts remain divided over its net impact – and our ability to contain the risks
As Schaake wrote in the Financial Times this week: “Across the US, grass-roots movements are forming to protest against various excesses and the effects of the technology, from parents furious about the harms done to children with chatbot companions to communities attempting to block data centres and objecting to company contracts with government agencies.”
Shumer’s essay comes not from the consumers of AI but its producers – within the “deep-geek” AI and coding community, where recent innovations have seen AI code-writers being superseded by AI agents: algorithms writing algorithms. Views on Shumer’s essay range from dismissing it as a masterpiece of hype to a description of the obvious.
Something big is happening but there is wide disagreement over the balance of good vs harm and our capacity to contain the dangers. There is consensus that we have faced many historically transformative moments before and adapted – but that this particular transformation is without precedent.
ByteDance ‘strengthening safeguards’ after Seedance AI video controversy
