Make Page Six a Preferred Source Kylie Jenner’s legal troubles could get even worse as more former employees are preparing to sue the reality star.
“There are more lawsuits against Kylie coming. This isn’t the end,” a source exclusively told Page Six. “The claims are substantially similar to the current lawsuits.”
The warning came after the Kylie Cosmetics founder was hit with four separate lawsuits from former household employees in just seven months.
The women, who worked as housekeepers and a private chef at Jenner’s properties, accused the beauty mogul and members of her staff of discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination and numerous labor violations.
Their allegations included claims that one employee was trapped inside Jenner’s closet, another was forced to hide whenever “The Kardashians” star was home, and a pregnant chef who suffered a miscarriage after allegedly being required to perform physically demanding work.
Jenner’s legal representative Michael Rhodes previously denied the allegations against the entrepreneur, telling Page Six in a statement, “These latest cases are being brought by the same lawyer who previously filed claims on behalf of Kylie’s former household staff. It’s clear that this lawyer wants to use publicity to try and extract an unwarranted payday.”
Stay one step ahead with all the exclusive tea on your favorite reality TV stars! Sign up for Virtual Reali-Tea with Danny and Evan, our must-read newsletter!
He added, “We’re not going to be intimidated into doing that. As such, we’ll defend these meritless cases vigorously and look forward to telling our side of the story.”
Meanwhile, attorney Della Shaker, who represents all four former employees, fired back in a statement shared with Page Six, “We are here to protect rights, not reputations. And we will not back down.”
“The truth should never be buried behind wealth, fear, or silence,” she added. “No one should fear speaking the truth.”
The most recent lawsuit was filed on Nov. 5 in Los Angeles Superior Court by former housekeeper Dinora Carolina Cabria Amaya, who accused Jenner, her companies and several members of her household staff of disability discrimination, retaliation, wrongful termination and numerous labor violations.
Amaya, who claimed she began working for Jenner in March 2025, alleged she was paid $40 an hour in cash and typically worked six days a week without receiving proper overtime pay.
In one of the lawsuit’s most shocking allegations, Amaya claimed she was trapped inside Jenner’s closet for more than an hour after being instructed by supervisor Laura Dooley to enter the room using a passcode.
When she called Dooley in a panic and begged for help, the supervisor allegedly “laughed and mocked” her.
“No one is at the house that can let you out and I cannot give the password to anyone else, you just have to wait,” Dooley allegedly told her, according to the complaint.
Amaya claimed she remained trapped until someone eventually released her, leaving her suffering from severe anxiety and emotional distress.
She also alleged that an unsecured canister of pepper spray accidentally discharged directly into her eyes and face while she was cleaning a laundry room drawer in September 2025.
Amaya claimed the incident left her suffering from “blurry vision, burning, itching, dryness, irritation, and a constant sand-like sensation,” but that she was not provided with adequate medical assistance.
The following month, she alleged she was bitten by a dog while cleaning a doghouse at one of Jenner’s properties and was forced to treat the injury herself.
Amaya claimed she was ultimately fired on Feb. 6 after repeatedly complaining about her injuries, working conditions and unpaid wages.
Her lawsuit followed three other legal battles involving former members of Jenner’s household staff.
The first was filed April 17 by former housekeeper Angelica Hernandez Vasquez, who accused Jenner and her companies of discrimination, harassment and retaliation.
Vasquez, who claimed she began working for Jenner in September 2024, alleged she was mistreated because of her Salvadoran background, Catholic faith and immigration status.
According to the complaint, Vasquez “was treated with hostility and exclusion,” by supervisors identified as Patsy and Elsi, who allegedly made her feel unwelcome at Jenner’s Hidden Hills home.
Vasquez claimed in the suit that she was routinely “assigned the most difficult and undesirable tasks; excluded from the housekeeping team; publicly belittled and humiliated in front of coworkers due to her race, national origin and religion; and subjected to intimidation and demeaning treatment.”
The former housekeeper alleged that her supervisors mocked her accent, snapped their fingers at her and made derogatory remarks about her religion, including allegedly declaring, “Catholics are horrible people.”
Vasquez alleged the hostile working conditions left her suffering from anxiety and symptoms consistent with post-traumatic stress disorder before she resigned in August 2025.
Less than two weeks later, on April 29, another former housekeeper, Juana Delgado Soto, filed a separate lawsuit accusing Jenner and her companies of discrimination, harassment and retaliation.
Soto, who claimed she began working for Jenner in 2019, alleged she was subjected to years of mistreatment by supervisors, including being mocked over her accent and immigration status.
In one incident, Soto claimed she was forced to work late on her birthday, causing her to miss a surprise party.
“No one cares about your birthday, Kylie is having a dinner,” a supervisor allegedly told her.
Soto also claimed she was mistreated following the death of her brother in March 2025.
According to the complaint, fellow staff members allegedly accused her of lying about his death, threw trash on the floor for her to pick up and refused to let her take time off to attend his funeral mass.
When she broke down crying and asked for water, she was allegedly told she could not drink Jenner’s water.
Desperate for help, Soto claimed she wrote a letter to Jenner detailing the alleged mistreatment and placed it on the reality star’s massage bed.
“I need to express just how terribly I am mentally abused,” she wrote, according to the complaint.
Soto claimed she was threatened with termination the following day and instructed never to contact Jenner again.
She claimed supervisors later forbade her from looking at or smiling at Jenner and instructed her to “disappear” whenever the star was nearby.
Soto resigned in August 2025, claiming she could no longer tolerate the alleged mistreatment.
Then, in June, a former private chef identified in court documents as Jane Doe sued Jenner and several members of her team, alleging pregnancy discrimination, harassment and wrongful termination.
The chef claimed she was forced to work grueling shifts despite informing her supervisors that she had a high-risk pregnancy.
According to the lawsuit, she was required to perform physically demanding work during a birthday celebration for one of Jenner’s children in Palm Springs, Calif., in February 2025.
The chef alleged she became so exhausted that she broke down crying in a bathroom during the event.
The following morning, she claimed she began suffering severe bleeding and rushed to a hospital, where she learned she had miscarried.
She claimed she continued to face mistreatment after the pregnancy loss and was eventually reprimanded by a supervisor.
“Stop it, just stop it. You are upsetting Kylie. You are making her depressed,” the supervisor allegedly told her.
All four lawsuits remain pending, and the allegations against Jenner, her companies and members of her household staff have not been proven in court.
Your voice matters. Discussions are moderated for civility. Read our guidelines here
Community Guidelines Welcome to the Page Six Community! Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas in a safe space.
In order to do so, we've created a simple set of rules that will improve your experience.
Your post will/might be rejected if it contains:
User accounts will/might be blocked if we notice:
Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Don't forget, freedom of speech is not the freedom of reach!
