Billionaire venture capitalist Vinod Khosla says judge AI by usage, not stock prices Jared Blikre Wed, November 11, 2026 at 2:02 PM EST 3 min read GOOGM +1.83% META -0.87% MSFT -2.50% ORCL +9.24% AMZN -1.59% Explore stocks on Coinbase Trading disclosure Trading disclosure The above button links to Coinbase. Yahoo Finance is not a broker-dealer or investment adviser and does not offer securities or cryptocurrencies for sale or facilitate trading. Coinbase pays us for certain activity generated through this link. Prices displayed are informational.
Wall Street wants to know whether AI is a bubble. Most of the worry is about who's paying for it.
The companies leading the build-out are spending faster than their businesses bring in cash. Combined free cash flow for Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL), Meta (META), Microsoft (MSFT), and Oracle (ORCL) fell to about minus $31 billion in the third quarter, according to Goldman Sachs. That's down from positive $37 billion to $62 billion a quarter through 2025.
All that spending is a bet that people will use AI. Vinod Khosla, the billionaire Sun Microsystems co-founder and early OpenAI (OPAI.PVT) backer, says usage is the number to watch, not the stock market's mood swings. "It's not prices, it's actual usage," he said Tuesday on Yahoo Finance's Deirdre Bosa Live. He measures it in tokens — the chunks of text AI models process.
By that measure, the boom is real. Much of Big Tech's cash goes into computing power that AI labs rent to run their chatbots, and those labs' sales are taking off. OpenAI's quarterly revenue jumped nearly 50% to $10 billion.
Khosla has history on his side. "When you look at internet traffic, you can't tell where the bubble was," he said. The share of Americans online kept climbing through the dot-com crash, from about 43% in 2000 to 59% in 2002, even as the Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC) lost 78%.
Usage was never the problem. Overbuilding was. Telecoms spent more than $500 billion laying fiber, and with 85% of it sitting unused, the cost of bandwidth fell 90%, according to research by Kai Wu, founder of Sparkline Capital.
Corning (GLW), which made the glass, fell 99% from 2000 to 2002 and didn't top its dot-com high until February, a month after it signed a deal worth up to $6 billion to supply fiber for Meta's AI data centers. The AI rush then more than doubled the stock by late June. The stock has since given back more than half, closing Tuesday near its 2000 peak.
Cheap bandwidth was a gift to whoever came next. Netflix and Meta "came around and started using it," Wu said on Yahoo Finance's Stocks in Translation podcast.
Alphabet, Meta, and Netflix (NFLX), none of which was public when the Nasdaq peaked, have added more than $5 trillion in market value since their first trades. Cisco (CSCO) is worth about $174 billion less than at its 2000 peak, per Yahoo Finance calculations.
The roles have since flipped. "Instead of Global Crossing, we now have Google," Wu said.
The bandwidth pattern is already showing up in AI. OpenAI cut its Luna model's price 80% after launch, and "we saw use go up almost 10x," CFO Sarah Friar said on the same show.
If history rhymes, the winners will treat AI as a cheap ingredient. Wu's research finds early AI adopters are "more evenly spread across sectors" than in infrastructure stocks. "All of medicine is a massive application area," Khosla said.
Unlike fiber, AI chips are still scarce. "There is going to be a silicon shortage for a couple of years," Khosla said.
But chips wear out over years, not decades, Wu noted, giving builders less time to earn back what they spend.
John Chambers, who ran Cisco through the dot-com boom and bust, told Yahoo Finance's Sozzi Unleashed this month that he expects "major train wrecks" this time too, because "rising tide does not raise all boats."
Internal AI tools helped analyze interview transcripts, research, and draft this post. Humans reviewed, edited, and fact-checked this post before publication.
Follow Jared Blikre on X at @SPYJared or email him at jaredblikre@yahooinc.com.
