Tuesday, November 10, 2026
Privacy-First Edition
Back to NNN
Entertainment

Comedian David Walliams is named as anonymous celebrity in sexual misconduct allegations after failed attempt to conceal his identity

Make Page Six a Preferred Source David Walliams has been identified as the “suicidal” celeb accused of sexual misconduct trying to stop publications from revealing his name.

The comedian has previously threatened to take his own life if his identity was revealed by the media, as The Guardian did Tuesday morning.

He was seeking an injunction against Independent Television News (ITN) as well as Guardian News and Media, who wanted to publish the allegations along with his name, but he lost his bid on Nov. 3 when the judge ruled he can be named.

The celebrity was accused of “abus[ing] power and status” to contact young women and try to engage in “inappropriate and exploitative sexual activities.”

“The claim brought by the claimant is dismissed and the application for the injunction is refused,” Mr. Justice Nicklin told the London High Court.

Initially though, Nicklin had put forth an interim injunction which protected his anonymity while he and his legal team decided whether to appeal.

His legal team told the court their client was not well enough to make a decision on whether to appeal.

Want more celebrity and pop culture news? Start your day with Page Six Daily.

During the proceedings, his attorney, Sara Mansoori KC, argued that if her client’s name was published, he would try take to take his own life, as he already attempted to do so twice before.

She told the court, “The only reason they would not be fatal is because the claimant would be locked up and prevented from his desire to end his life.”

“The claimant has attempted suicide twice as a result of these matters, been hospitalized for months, been the subject of involuntary detention and been examined by multiple – now more than 10 – doctors.”

Mansoori also said that while the claimant denies the allegations, he “has no intention of returning to public life.”

As for ITN and GNM, their attorney argued that “the obligation falls on the hospital to keep him safe,” not the media organizations.

He also argued that his alleged victims who have come forward “have been traumatized by the claimant’s alleged conduct and have suffered mental health crises and mental illness as a result.”

Your voice matters. Discussions are moderated for civility. Read our guidelines here

Community Guidelines Welcome to the Page Six Community! Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas in a safe space.

In order to do so, we've created a simple set of rules that will improve your experience.

Your post will/might be rejected if it contains:

User accounts will/might be blocked if we notice:

Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Don't forget, freedom of speech is not the freedom of reach!

Read original at New York Post

The Perspectives

0 verified voices · Three viewpoints · Real discourse

Left
0
Be the first to share a left perspective
Center
0
Be the first to share a center perspective
Right
0
Be the first to share a right perspective

Related Stories