Monday, November 9, 2026
Privacy-First Edition
Back to NNN
Business

A Blue Tsunami in State and Local Government Elections May Have Just Driven a Dagger Through the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Data Center Trade

Via Motley Fool

Bram Berkowitz, The Motley Fool Mon, November 9, 2026 at 5:50 PM EST NVDA -4.04% Trade NVIDIA on Coinbase Trading disclosure Trading disclosure The above button links to Coinbase. Yahoo Finance is not a broker-dealer or investment adviser and does not offer securities or cryptocurrencies for sale or facilitate trading. Coinbase pays us for certain activity generated through this link. Prices displayed are informational.

While Democrats are celebrating the midterm elections that enabled them to reclaim control of both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate, they may still be unable to make big changes over the next few years.

That's because President Donald Trump still holds veto power that requires a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate to override. Democrats didn't obtain 60 Senate seats, so it's unlikely they'll be able to override the filibuster, either.

Missed AI's "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 16x Bigger. Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005. But according to our analysts, we're only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout. Continue »

That said, Democrats performed incredibly well on the state and local levels, including in areas that haven't gone blue in decades. The state and local "blue tsunami" may have just driven a dagger through the artificial intelligence (AI) data center trade.

Voters elected Democratic governors in Texas and Georgia, which haven't seen a blue governor in decades. According to the Associated Press, Democratic governors will preside in at least 28 states starting in 2027.

Furthermore, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures on Nov. 6, polling data suggest Democrats will flip at least 11 state chambers (House or Senate), although many results still aren't final.

Many Democratic governors and state lawmakers have promised either to ban data centers or to advocate for more regulation of them.

For instance, according to Reuters, incoming Texas Gov. Gina Hinojosa campaigned on halting new data center approvals until state lawmakers could pass laws "to protect Texans, so that Texans have a seat at the table to decide if and how data centers come into our community."

Hinojosa defeated incumbent Gov. Greg Abbott, who had been perceived as more friendly to data centers until he flipped his position on the matter in the final month before the midterms. Georgia's soon-to-be governor, Keisha Lance Bottoms, also campaigned on a data center pause.

Dozens of municipalities also approved nearly all the data center moratoriums on midterm ballots.

While data centers do provide jobs, they can also drive up electricity costs and use tremendous amounts of resources, such as water. At a time when people are grappling with costs and worried about AI safety and AI taking their jobs, data centers are clearly not popular.

In stark contrast, President Donald Trump believes that AI and data centers should not be paused because the U.S. is in an AI race with other countries.

Now, I don't think many state and local governments will permanently ban data centers. It's tough to outright ban an industry, especially if it can provide economic value. That said, state and local governments can make the cost of doing business much higher and significantly delay them.

The hyperscalers may be able to afford to wait, but some of the neoclouds have deteriorating balance sheets, and the delays could prove costly for their stocks.

Consider a company like Elon Musk's Space Exploration Technologies, which has significant data center capacity and plans to build more. Musk reportedly spent $224 million on Texas races in favor of Republican candidates.

On SpaceX's most recent earnings call, on Oct. 20, Musk said he expected the company to build and bring online an incremental 10 gigawatts of AI compute in 2027 alone, even suggesting that the number could be closer to 20 GW.

While it's hard to know how much of SpaceX's planned data centers are already underway, local restrictions could slow the build-out, and data centers are the company's biggest revenue generator right now and a near-term driver of growth.

If SpaceX experiences further delays and analysts revise revenue and earnings estimates downward, that could be a tough blow to the stock.

Building data centers may become more expensive, and investors are already concerned about whether such spending will yield adequate returns will likely be even more worried.

Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005.

But according to our analysts, we're only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout, a massive technology build-out that Google's CEO says could be more profound than fire or electricity.

While everyone watches the chip designers, one "backbone" company provides the critical technology that Nvidia and AMD literally cannot function without. We've detailed this under-the-radar player in our new AI Playbook.

Bram Berkowitz has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Space Exploration Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

A Blue Tsunami in State and Local Government Elections May Have Just Driven a Dagger Through the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Data Center Trade was originally published by The Motley Fool

Read original at Yahoo Finance News

The Perspectives

0 verified voices · Three viewpoints · Real discourse

Left
0
Be the first to share a left perspective
Center
0
Be the first to share a center perspective
Right
0
Be the first to share a right perspective

Related Stories