People in Tehran drive past an anti-US billboard depicting US president Donald Trump and the Strait of Hormuz. Photograph: Majid Asgaripour/Wana/ReutersView image in fullscreenPeople in Tehran drive past an anti-US billboard depicting US president Donald Trump and the Strait of Hormuz. Photograph: Majid Asgaripour/Wana/ReutersTrump tells Iran to accept deal or face new wave of US bombingPresident issues fresh ultimatum despite US claims that progress has been made in stalled negotiations with Tehran
The US president, Donald Trump, has issued a fresh ultimatum, telling Iran to accept a deal to end the war in the Middle East or face a new wave of US bombing “at a much higher level and intensity than it was before”.
The social media announcement on Wednesday was the latest in a rapid series of dramatic and often contradictory changes in policy and came amid reports the US was claiming progress in stalled negotiations between Tehran and Washington.
“Assuming Iran agrees to give what has been agreed to, which is perhaps a big assumption, the already legendary Epic Fury will be at an end,” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, referring to the military operation he launched with Israel against Iran in February.
Read more“If they don’t agree, the bombing starts, and it will be, sadly, at a much higher level and intensity than it was before.”
Earlier on Wednesday Axios reported that Washington and Tehran were close to agreeing on a one-page memorandum of understanding to end the war.
The US-based news outlet reported that the US expects Iran to respond to several key points in the next 48 hours, and that while nothing has yet been agreed, this was the closest the parties had been to an agreement since the war began.
Officials in Pakistan told the Guardian that an initial framework deal could possibly be agreed within 48 hours but that nothing was certain and that talks remain “difficult”.
Late on Tuesday, Trump abruptly ordered an indefinite pause to a naval effort to guide stranded commercial ships through the Strait of Hormuz, which in normal times carries about a fifth of the world’s oil and liquid gas supplies.
More than 800 ships and roughly 20,000 crew members remain stranded west of the narrow waterway.
Iran has threatened to deploy mines, drones, missiles and fast-attack craft, making passage through the strait too risky for commercial shipping and spiking fuel prices around the world.
Trump wrote on social media that the decision to halt the new naval effort – called “Project Freedom” – just a day after it began came after requests from “mediator Pakistan and other countries”. He said “Great Progress has been made toward a Complete and Final Agreement” with Tehran.
The US president said Washington’s blockade of Iranian ports, which is aimed at forcing Iran to make concessions in negotiations to end the war, would remain in place.
Trump, who is due to visit Beijing next week, has often threatened in recent weeks to restart the joint US-Israeli air offensive against Iran, but has also repeatedly signalled his desire to see a negotiated end to the conflict.
“Things are moving forward but it is too early to say if a framework will be decided in the next 48 hours,” a senior Pakistani political source said. The focus is on obtaining a permanent ceasefire and “opening of the strait of Hormuz by both, at least for 60 days”.
“That gives a chance for both parties to talk out all important matters, including uranium enrichment. But nothing is finalised yet. Things are under discussion. We expect something to come out before the US president visits China … The Iranians remain hopeful and believe that things are moving forward in a positive direction,” the source said.
View image in fullscreenPresident Donald Trump will visit Beijing next week for the first time since 2017. It is hoped China will become a guarantor in the peace deal. Photograph: Andy Wong/APAnother Pakistani official said that there was still a lack of trust between Iran and the US.
“There is still ambiguity in talks and nothing is completely decided. It is still 50/50 and things can go either way. The moment the US ends the blockade and the strait of Hormuz remains open, that will be the beginning of real talks. As long as there is a blockade from both sides, talks remain difficult. That’s why a framework of understanding to end the blockade for at least 30 to 60 days for further negotiations is important. It can be a trust-building measure,” the official said.
Analysts say that an external guarantor of any deal is essential.
“Pakistan and Iran both want China to become a guarantor but … Does China even have that power over both parties? Everyone has their doubts,” said the official.
The news of a potential deal sent the price of oil – which had jumped as much as 6% earlier this week on the latest attacks in the Middle East – tumbling.
An Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson said on Wednesday that Tehran was reviewing a US proposal to end the more than two-month-old war and will convey its views to the mediator, Pakistan, according to ISNA media platform.
However Iran’s Tasnim news agency, which is associated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, said US media reports on any deal were aimed at justifying Trump’s retreat from his latest hostile action on Hormuz Strait.
Many observers believe that wide gaps remain between Iran and the US, making a ceasefire unlikely in the short term.
An Israeli source familiar with the matter told Reuters that Israel was not aware that Trump was potentially close to a deal with Iran and was preparing for an escalation in fighting.
Trump is due to visit China next week and may be seeking something that could be portrayed as a breakthrough before arriving in Beijing, analysts suggested. China called on Monday for a comprehensive ceasefire in the Iran war.
Beijing’s has close economic and political ties to Tehran but has failed to exert significant leverage over the radical Islamist Iranian regime since the war began. The Trump administration may want China to exploit that relationship to convince the Islamic Republic to open the Strait of Hormuz.
Trump’s trip next week will be his first visit to China during his second term and the first by a US president since Trump visited in 2017.
The war, which began with an Israeli strike that killed Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s then supreme leader, now appears to have reached a stalemate. Iran is suffering huge economic losses, which may escalate dramatically if it begins to run out of storage capacity for its oil, but Trump is under pressure domestically and internationally as fuel prices surge in the US and across the rest of the world.
US officials have insisted the ceasefire in the Middle East is holding and that – while the conflict is not resolved – the initial major US military operation against Iran has concluded.
Monday saw a new spike in violence, with Iranian missiles and drones striking United Arab Emirates for the first time for weeks, and reported clashes in the strait of Hormuz itself.
US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, said that the US had successfully secured a path through the waterway and that hundreds of commercial ships were lining up to pass through.
“We know the Iranians are embarrassed by this fact. They said they control the strait. They do not,” Hegseth said.
Control of the strait and the threat to restart attacks on nearby countries’ oil and other infrastructure in the Gulf are the two main cards that Iran can play in negotiations to end the war and over its nuclear programme.
Leaders in both Washington and Tehran appear to believe they are close to victory and so have been unwilling to make significant concessions to allow the on-off negotiation process mediated by Pakistan to make progress.
Rising petrol prices and a slowing global economy also pose a political threat to Trump as the US approaches congressional elections in November. A Democratic win in one or both chambers would weaken his presidency. Trump has so far shrugged off domestic concerns with some reports suggesting he is more interested in securing what he sees as his historic legacy than any immediate political concerns.
