Rather than encouraging more births, Hong Kong should align its family-related policies with the Greater Bay Area’s demographic system
3-MIN READ3-MINTerry LumTerry Lum is Henry G. Published: 5:30am, 2 May 2026Hong Kong is increasingly being urged to develop a comprehensive population policy. Academics, policymakers and business leaders warn that rapid ageing, low fertility and a shrinking labour force threaten the city’s competitiveness, and call for more decisive government intervention.
That assumption reflects a city state logic. Yet Hong Kong today functions more like a core city within a vast mega-metropolitan region. Population policy built on the former mindset risks misdiagnosing the problem.
Hong Kong’s low fertility is no longer primarily a behavioural issue but increasingly a structural constraint. According to government statistics, Hongkongers’ median age rose to 49.4 years last year, with nearly a quarter of the population aged 65 or older. Most women are 40 or older – past the typical age for childbearing.
Immigration is often presented as a more practical alternative. Hong Kong has long depended on talent inflows and remaining open to skills and labour is widely seen as essential. Yet much of the debate collapses two very different processes into one: cross-border immigration and intra-metropolitan relocation.
