^GSPC -0.22% NVDA -0.74% Trade NVIDIA on Coinbase Trading disclosure Trading disclosure The above button links to Coinbase. Yahoo Finance is not a broker-dealer or investment adviser and does not offer securities or cryptocurrencies for sale or facilitate trading. Coinbase pays us for certain activity generated through this link. Prices displayed are informational.
The 2020s will go down in history as one of the best times to be a stock market investor. After a brief dip in 2022, the benchmark S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) has soared by an average of roughly 21% per year -- double its 100-year average annual return of 10%.
That said, history shows us that significant drawdowns often follow periods of unusually elevated stock market gains as the market reverts to its long-running mean. Let's discuss some of the challenges facing this bull market to try to figure out what might come next.
Missed AI's "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 14x Bigger. Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005. But according to our analysts, we're only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout. Continue »
By now, most investors have probably heard about the cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings (CAPE) ratio. This metric compares the price of the S&P 500 with its average inflation-adjusted earnings over the past decade. The long time frame smooths out short-term fluctuations, providing a clearer picture of the market's value relative to historical norms.
Right now, the CAPE ratio stands at 40.5, which is well above its average of 17.4. The other two major peaks occurred before the Great Depression in 1929 and during the dot-com bubble in 1999, when it hit its all-time high of 44.19. Both milestones were followed by substantial declines in equity prices over the subsequent years as the speculative bubbles deflated.
History might not repeat itself, but it certainly tends to rhyme. And the current generative AI bubble shows strong similarities with the dot-com bubble two decades ago. Both are being driven by a transformational new technology that may not pay off as quickly as its major backers expect.
On some level, the generative AI boom looks much safer than the dot-com bubble because it is being driven by stable, profitable companies instead of speculative start-ups. Valuations are also quite reasonable, with major players like Nvidia and Micron Technology boasting forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiples of just 25 and 6, respectively. Their revenue is simply growing so fast that their stock prices can't keep up.
But while these factors will probably limit the scale of a potential crash, they don't make one impossible, because the revenue itself comes from what appears to be an increasingly unsustainable source.
Goldman Sachs estimates that hyperscalers (Nvidia and Micron's clients) could spend $800 billion on AI-related capital expenditures (capex) in 2026 alone. And if current trends continue, spending could rise to $1.4 trillion by 2028.
The problem is that these funds could otherwise go back to these companies' shareholders via buybacks or dividends. And it may only be a matter of time before investors start punishing big spenders and pressuring management teams to adopt a more conservative approach.
A recent Wall Street Journal study found that American businesses and consumers would have to spend the equivalent of 8.8% of the country's GDP annually on AI to justify the industry's immense spending. This sounds like a tall order, which raises the possibility that many current data center investments will never pay off.
Cloud computing giant Oracle is a good example of what happens when shareholders lose their appetite for AI spending. Shares have fallen by 50% over the last 12 months alone. And other big spenders could also come under increasing scrutiny as they continue to pour hundreds of billions into a yet-unproven opportunity.
Timing the market is notoriously difficult because even if you correctly identify the problem, it can take months or even years for the rest of the market to react. Instead of selling everything, investors should focus on taking some profits off the table and diversifying their portfolios away from stocks overly exposed to generative AI-related spending.
Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut are built for long-term growth and could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $370,440!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,470,022!*
That performance is why people listen. With a track record of beating the S&P 500 by 4x, Stock Advisor offers a distinct advantage. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built for the long haul.
*Stock Advisor returns as of October 7, 2026.
Will Ebiefung has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Goldman Sachs Group, Nvidia, and Oracle. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
We Are Witnessing the Stock Market Do Something for Only the 3rd Time in 156 Years, and History Is Clear About What Comes Next was originally published by The Motley Fool
