Kevin Reddington and Lindsay Clancy look on as Judge William Sullivan (out of frame) instructs the jury to continue deliberating during Lindsay Clancy's murder trial at the Plymouth county superior court in Plymouth, Massachusetts, on 4 September. Photograph: AFP/Getty ImagesView image in fullscreenKevin Reddington and Lindsay Clancy look on as Judge William Sullivan (out of frame) instructs the jury to continue deliberating during Lindsay Clancy's murder trial at the Plymouth county superior court in Plymouth, Massachusetts, on 4 September. Photograph: AFP/Getty ImagesLindsay Clancy’s defense laywer asks judge to investigate lone jurorHoldout juror in Clancy’s case, Michael Desronvil, sided with the prosecutors, arguing that Clancy knew what she was doing when she killed her three young children
Lawyers for Lindsay Clancy have asked a judge to investigate the conduct of the lone juror who wanted to convict the mother from Massachusetts of murder in the deaths of her three children.
In a motion filed Friday but made public Monday, Clancy’s lawyers asked the court to question the juror about his alleged use of a cellphone during deliberations, his truthfulness on a questionnaire that prospective jurors filled out before the trial began and his truthfulness when jurors were questioned by the judge a day before the trial ended.
The judge declared a mistrial on 4 September after the jury insisted it couldn’t reach a unanimous verdict, despite days of trying. Eleven of 12 jurors were ready to clear Clancy of criminal responsibility, with the majority feeling that she was in the grip of a rare condition called postpartum psychosis when she strangled her kids. But one juror, Michael Desronvil, sided with the prosecutors, who had argued that Clancy knew what she was doing.
Read moreAmong other things, Clancy’s lawyer, Kevin Reddington, asked the court to obtain a record of any calls or texts Desronvil made between 8am and 4.30pm on each day the jury deliberated. Phone use during deliberations is prohibited in the state.
Prosecutors have yet to say whether they plan on putting Clancy on trial again. She remains charged with murder and is in a psychiatric hospital until her case is resolved.
In another motion on Monday, Clancy’s lawyers asked the judge to take the unusual step of dismissing the criminal case, rather than putting on a new trial, on the grounds that a mistrial shouldn’t have been declared in the first place.
They argued that the judge should have replaced the holdout juror with an alternate during the deliberations after a jury foreperson complained to the judge that one juror was refusing to listen to the law on reasonable doubt.
A spokesperson for Plymouth county district attorney Timothy Cruz would not comment on the motions.
Desronvil hasn’t been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with his service on the jury, though other jurors complained that he was inflexible in his opinion that Clancy was guilty.
In a statement released by his lawyer last week, Edward Paltzik, Desronvil said he “didn’t have any doubts” that Clancy knew what she was doing when she killed her three children.
